Excerpted and edited by the author
from his article of the same title published in Compendium of
Continuing Education in Dentistry, April 1996. For a full-length
reprint, please contact
us.
Introduction
Most adults and many children
suffer from bad breath (halitosis) occasionally, chronically or
regularly at specific times of the day. Public awareness and concern
for this phenomenon is evidenced by the support of an $850 million
mouthwash industry in the United States despite wide agreement
that commercially available products have no significant effect
on breath malodor.1
Physicians and dentists are generally poorly
informed about the causes and treatments for halitosis. It is
the purpose of this paper to review briefly our current understanding
of the etiologies of halitosis and current developments in its
diagnosis and treatment. The clinical techniques and strategies
for diagnosis and treatment that are described below have been
drawn from the research methods and results of Tonzetich2,
Preti3, Rosenberg4, Yaegaki5,
and Bosy6 as well as my own experience in treating
over 600 hundred patients presenting with a chief complaint of
"bad breath."
Research reports about the etiologies of
breath malodor agree that the vast majority of halitosis originates
with the anaerobic bacterial degradation of sulfur containing
amino acids within the oral cavity resulting in the emission of
hydrogen sulfide (H2S), methyl mercaptan (CH3SH)
and dimethyl sulfide (CH3SCH3), collectively
referred to as volatile sulfur compounds (VSC).2-5,7
Therefore, it is most reasonably the responsibility of dentists
to diagnose and manage breath malodor. When systemic or other
non-oral etiologies are suspected, dentists must be prepared to
prescribe the appropriate medical referrals. While there are many
common non-oral diseases cited in the literature8-10
for which halitosis can be a symptom, halitosis typically occurs
late in the pathogeneses of these diseases when other more obvious
or more urgent symptoms are present.7,11,12 Rapid onset,
and progressively intensifying breath malodor is suggestive of
an infective process, possibly secondary to carcinomas or other
localized pathologies in the airway.8,11 However, patients
with a sole, chief complaint of long-standing, chronic halitosis
have, almost without exception, either an oral etiology for halitosis
or no halitosis at all.
Imaginary Halitosis
In dealing with patients seeking professional
care for halitosis, one must be prepared to differentiate between
those patients who emit above average malodor, those who emit
average or near average malodor but are more sensitive to it,
and those who emit below average or no odor but believe that their
breath is offensive despite objective evidence to the contrary.
In the former two cases treatment for malodor is warranted; in
the latter it is not.
There are many patients who complain of chronic
bad breath for whom no objective evidence of breath malodor can
be identified.8,13-17 Olfactory reference syndrome
is a recognized psychiatric condition in which there occurs a
somatization of some distress resulting in a belief on the part
of the patient that an offensive odor emanates from some body
part usually the mouth. This condition interferes with normal
social interactions for fear of offending others with breath malodor
and has been described in the psychiatric literature for over
100 years. 13,14 Affective disorders and schizophrenia
were reported to develop in patients whose initial complaints
were limited to breath malodor, and some success has been reported
in treating olfactory reference syndrome with tricyclic antidepressants
and the neuroleptic primozide.15-17 If breath malodor
cannot be detected organoleptically from a patient complaining
of bad breath, if above normal VSC cannot be demonstrated instrumentally
and if the patient cannot provide reliable third-party verification
of an odor problem, olfactory reference syndrome ("Imaginary
halitosis") must be considered.
Oral Causes of Breath
Malodor
Tonzetich2 demonstrated
that incubated whole saliva produced a putrid odor and that hydrogen
sulfide (H2S), methyl mercaptan (CH3SH)
and dimethyl sulfide (CH3SCH3) were the
principal malodorants. When the saliva is filtered, incubated
supernate alone produces very little VSC. Saliva filtrate contains
dead epithelial cells, live and dead bacteria, white blood cells,
other blood elements and food debris all of which are rich in
proteins and amino acids. Through a series of painstaking experiments,
Tonzetich and co-workers established that the malodorous volatiles
produced by incubated whole saliva was due to the action of anaerobic
bacteria on sulfur-containing amino acids derived from degraded
proteins present in salivary filtrate. He also observed that the
incubated saliva of patients suffering from periodontal disease
produced a more rapidly developing and a more intense evolution
of VSC. VSC that evolved from substrates high in the amino acid
cystine were high in hydrogen sulfide, while VSC that evolved
from high methionine substates evolved VSC high in methyl mercaptan.
Direct measurement of breath volatiles using
gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy confirmed that in vitro
mechanisms of VSC production in incubated saliva was similar to
what occurs in human mouths that produce malodor. Kostelcl8
and othersl9,20 have shown that patients suffering
from periodontal disease produced more breath malodor and VSC
than patients with healthy periodontiums. However, it has been
reported that periodontal disease is not a prerequisite for the
production of high levels of orally generated VSC and consequent
oral malodor.6 I have personally seen many young children,
young adults with no clinical evidence of periodontal diseases,
adults with inactive and/or well controlled periodontitis, and
totally edentulous patients who have high levels of orally generated
VSC and oral malodor. Some of these patients have extremely intense
malodor and extremely high VSC in their mouth air. Yaegaki 5
and others 2l-23 have identified the tongue and other
soft tissue surfaces of the mouth as principal locations of intra-oral
bacterial growth and odor production.
Diagnosis and Treatment
of Orally Generated Breath Malodor
Before their first visit to the office,
patients are instructed to abstain from food. breath fresheners,
and oral hygiene for 6 hours; smoking for 12 hours; scented cosmetics
for 24 hours; onions, garlic, and spicy foods for 48 hours; and
antibiotics for 3 weeks. The first step in diagnosing the cause
of a patient's complaint of bad breath is to determine if the
complaint is objectively verifiable. A history of recent and repeated
verbal confirmations of breath malodor from friends or family
members is usually a reliable indicator. Separate organoleptic
assessments of oral, nasal and pulmonary air are performed and
recorded independently by two operators in manners similar to
those described by Rosenberg 24 and Preti.3
Comparative VSC concentrations in oral, nasal
and pulmonary air are determined with a sulfide monitor modified
since first described by Rosenberg. The instrument is equally
sensitive to H2S and CH3SH in the range
of 0-500 ppb with a 0-100 mv full-scale analog output which drives
a small penwriter. If nasal air VSC concentration and malodor
are above normal and significantly higher than those of oral or
pulmonary air, the patient should be examined carefully for oral-antral
or oro-nasal fistulas and referred for a nasal endoscopy. Should
lung air VSC concentration and malodor be above normal and significantly
higher than those of oral or nasal air, the patient should be
referred for laryngoscopic and pulmonary examinations, and liver
function studies should be considered. In the vast majority of
cases the organoleptic and VSC assessments indicate that the oral
cavity is the source of malodor.
The patient is given a complete dental examination
since crown and bridge washouts, uncontrolled periodontal diseases
and other dental infections can contribute to orally generated
breath malodor. Localized dental infections are often the source
of patients' complaints of self-perceived bad tastes or odors
which are not necessarily perceived by others. With the exception
of anterior crown and bridge cement washouts, dental and periodontal
diseases need not be treated definitively in order to gain control
of breath malodor. However, the ease with which patients can maintain
control of their malodor after treatment is enhanced by traditional
treatments of infective dental and periodontal diseases.
Because orally generated breath malodor is
caused by the emission of thiols and sulfides by anaerobic bacteria,
treatment is directed toward permanently reducing oral anaerobes.
For this purpose an intraoral liquid-air spray device and an ultrasonic
intraoral dental cleaner unit have been designed to deliver an
irrigant26 for antiseptic debridement of the hard and
soft tissues of the mouth. Following this procedure patients are
instructed in the use of home soft tissue cleaner and a high oxidation
potential mouth rinse.26 The regime performed two times
daily, in the morning and evening, is sufficient to maintain control
of breath odor in most individuals after undergoing the in-office
antiseptic debridement.
After treatment and maintenance instructions,
patients are instructed in a method for assessing breath odor
at home for 2-4 weeks after treatment. Patients then return for
a post treatment evaluation at which all organoleptic and VSC
assessments are repeated under the same pre-visit conditions and
at the same time of day as the pre-treatment evaluation. Adjustments
in the timing and frequency of the regimen are sometimes necessary
if the home assessment indicates malodor breakthroughs at specific
times of day.
Utilizing these diagnostic and treatment
techniques, breath malodor was totally eliminated in 97% of all
patients presenting with some degree of verifiable breath malodor
as judged by the above described organoleptic and VSC assessments.
The remaining 3% (11 patients) had either significant improvement
with which they were satisfied or admitted to not following the
maintenance regimen. As judged by a post-treatment follow-up questionnaire
mailed to 1,343 patients between 4 and 20 weeks after in-office
treatment, 78% of respondents indicated that they had experienced
"significant improvement" in their breath odor as a
result of treatment and maintenance. Another 18% indicated a "somewhat
significant improvement" while 4% indicated "no improvement."
Conclusion
Bad breath is a major concern for many people.
Because it nearly always originates from the mouth, it can and
should be diagnosed and treated professionally by dentists. There
is no "stand-alone" product solution for halitosis nor
do traditional standards of dental or periodontal care necessarily
eliminate the problem. Recent developments in the understanding
of the etiologies of breath malodor have spawned new techniques
for its assessment and management. A clinical protocol for diagnosing
and treating chronic halitosis has been outlined here that is
highly effective, reliable and leads to long-term patient satisfaction.
References
1. Mouthwashes. Consumer
Reports pp 607-610, Sept, 1992.
2. Tonzetich J: Production and origin of oral
malodor. J Periodontol 28:13-20,1977.
3. Preti G, Clark L, Cowart B J, Feldman R S,
Lowrey L D, Weber E, Young I M: Non-oral etiologies of oral malodor
and altered chemosensation. J Periodontiol 63:790-96,1992.
4. Rosenberg M, McCulloch C A G: Measurement
of oral malodor. J Periodontiol 63:776-82,1992.
5. Yaegaki K. Sanada K: Biochemical and clinical
factors influencing oral malodor in periodontal patients. J
Periodontol 63:783-89,1992.
6. Bosy A, Kulkarni G V, Rosenberg M, McCulloch
C A G: Relationship of oral malodor to periodontitis. J Periodontol
in press.
7. Persson S, Edlund M-B, Claesson R, Carlsson
J: The formation of hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan by oral
bacteria.Oral Microbial Immunol 6:195-202,1990.
8. Attia E L, Marshall K G: Halitosis. Can
Medical Association J 126:1281-85, 1982.
9. Lu D P: Halitosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Path 54:521-26,1982.
10. McDowell J D, Kassenbaum, D K: Diagnosing and treating
halitosis. JADA 124:55-64,1993.
11. Lorber B: Bad breath: Presenting manifestation
of anaerobic pulmonary infection. Am Rev Resp Dis 112:875-77,
1975.
12. Chen S, Zieve L, Mahadeven V: Mercaptans and dimethyl
sulfide in the breath of patients with cirrhosis of the liver.
J Lab Clin Med 75:628-35, 1976.
13. Stinnett J L: The functional somatic syndrome.
Psychiatr Clin North Am 10:19-33, 1987.
14. Pryse-Phillips W: An olfactory reference syndrome.
Acta Psychiatr Scand 47:484-509, 1974.
15. Malasi T H, El-Hilu S R, Mirza I A, El-islem M
F: Olfactory delusional syndrome with various etiologies. Br
J Psychiatry 156:256-60, 1990.
16. Beary M D, Cobb J P: Solitary psychosis. Br
J Psychiatry 138:64-66, 1981.
17. Davidson M, Mukherjee S: Progression of olfactory
reference syndrome to mania--a case report. Am J Psychiatry
139:1623-24, 1982.
18. Kostelc J G, Preti G, Zelson P R, et al: Oral odors
in early experimental gingivitis. J Periodontal Res 19:303-12,
1984.
19. Yaegaki K, Sanada K: Volatile sulfur compounds
in mouth air from clinically healthy subjects and patients with
periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res 27:233-38, 1992.
20. Coil, J M, Tonzetich J: Characterization of volatile
sulphur compounds production at individual gingival cervicular
sites in humans. J Clin Dent 3:97-103, 1993.
21. Jacobson S E, Crawford J J, McFall W R: Oral physiotherapy
of the tongue and palate: Relationship to plaque control. JADA
87:134-39, 1973
22. Gilmore E L, Gross A, Whitley R: Effect of tongue
brushing on plaque bacteria. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path
36:201-4, 1973.
23. Gilmore E L, Bashkar S N: Effect of tongue brushing
on bacteria and plaque formed in vitro. J Periodontal
43:418-22, 1972.
24. Rosenberg, M: Bad breath: Diagnosis and treatment.
Univ Tor Dent J pp 3-2, 7-11, 1990.
25. Rosenberg M, Septon I, Eli F, et al: Halitosis
measurement by an industrial sulphide monitor. Am J Periodontal
62:487-89, 1991.
26. Profresh, Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
|